Monday, October 29, 2012

BRIEF: REPORT ON TERRORISM (NCTC–USA:2011)


The National Counter Terrorism Center's 2011 Report on Terrorism was released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in June 2012. Here are some India Specific Highlights >>>

  • Over 10000 terrorist attacks occurred in 2011, affecting nearly 45,000 victims in 70 countries and resulting in over 12,500 deaths
  • Terror attacks related deaths in 2011: Afghanistan 3353, Iraq 3063, Pakistan 2033, Somalia 1101, Nigeria 593 and India 479.
  • Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan together accounted for 64% of the terrorist attacks in the world during 2011. 
  • While attacks in Afghanistan and Iraq decreased from 2010 by 14 and 16 percent, respectively, attacks in Pakistan increased by 8 percent.
  • In 2011, 56% of the world's terrorist attacks (5700) were by Sunni Muslims. 70% of worldwide deaths were of Sunni Muslims.
  • Among this perpetrator group, al-Qa‘ida (AQ) and its affiliates were responsible for at least 688 attacks that resulted in almost 2,000 deaths,
  • Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan conducted over 800 attacks that resulted in nearly 1,900 deaths.
  • The most active of the secular, political, and anarchist groups in 2011 included the FARC (377 attacks), the Communist Party of India-Maoist (CPI-Maoist) (351 attacks), the New People’s Army/Communist Party of the Philippines (NPA-CPP) (102 attacks), and the Kurdistan Worker’s Party (PKK) in Turkey (48 attacks)Out of 12533 terror victims of the world in 2011, 8886 were killed by Sunni Muslim extremists
  • There were 279 suicide attacks in the world during 2011. Sunni Muslims conducted 93% of these suicide terror attacks.
  • Out of 12000+ killed by terrorists in 2011, 6418 were civilians. 755 were children. Nearly 90% of terror victims were Muslims.


2011 Attacks in India that Resulted in Ten or More Fatalities 
  • June 2011 - Indian extremists, probably from the CPI-Maoist, killed 10 police officers in a IED blast and then firing.
  • July 2011 - Operatives probably from the Indian Mujahideen (IM) detonated three IEDs at two crowded market places and near a bus stop, killing dozens and wounding hundreds in Mumbai (July 12, 2011)
  • August 2011 - In India, a group of over 100 armed assailants probably affiliated with the CPI-Maoist group fired upon several military or paramilitary patrols, killing a dozen people.
  • Sept 2011 – Delhi High Court Blasts - Both Harakat ul-Jihad Islami (HUJI) and IM claimed responsibility for an IED attack that killed 15 civilians and wounded at least 91 others.
  • Dec 2011 - Militants probably from the CPI Maoist group launched an IED and small arms attack on a convoy carrying a former state legislative speaker, killing 12 police officers and one civilian in Jharkhand.



Tuesday, October 23, 2012

वाळूचे अर्थकारण


जगाचा इतिहास चाळून बघितला तर, प्रत्येक संघर्षामागे कुठले ना कुठले संसाधन आहे. 'ब्लड डायमंड' चित्रपटात एक संवाद आहे, "Throughout the history of Africa.. whenever a substance of value is found... the locals die in great numbers and in misery.. This was true of Ivory, rubber, gold and oil. It is now true for diamonds..."
वरील वाक्य वाळूला देखील लागू आहे. तोच जागतिक कित्ता पण स्थानिक पातळीवर! वाळूचे साठे आहेत ग्रामीण भागात, नदीच्या काठी. पण त्याची गरज आहे नागरी भागात. मागणी-पुरवठ्याचे हे गणित सामन्यांच्या लक्षात यायच्या आधी व्यापारी, बांधकाम व्यावसायिक आणि राजकारण यांची भट्टी जमली. आणि सुरु झाला वाळूचा रक्तरंजित खेळ!
वर्तमानपत्रातून वाळूबद्दल भरभरून लिहिले गेले आहे. पण ह्या लेखाचा उद्देश थोडासा वेगळा आहे. वाळूचे अर्थकारण समजून घेण्याचा प्रयत्न येथे केला आहे. ग्रामीण भागापासून शहरांपर्यंत आणि तेथून पुढे जागतिक आर्थिक विकासापर्यंत हे अर्थकारण गुंतले आहे. 'जागतिकीकरणा'च्या रेट्यात जागतिक घडामोडींचा परिणाम ग्रामीण भागापर्यंत होत आहे, तसेच ग्रामीण भागातील प्रश्न जागतिक पातळीवर उत्तर शोधत आहेत. वाळूचे अर्थकारण जरी स्थानिक पातळीवरचे असले तरी त्याचे परिणाम राष्ट्रीय आहेत. तसेच ह्या व्यवहाराचे परिणाम केवळ आर्थिक न राहता सामाजिक, राजकीय देखील झाले आहेत. त्यासंदर्भातच घेतलेला हा आढावा...
भारतात झपाट्याने नागरीकरण वाढत आहे. २०११ च्या जनगणनेनुसार सध्या ३१% नागरीकरण झाले आहे. हाच आकडा येत्या काही वर्षात ५०% पर्यंत जाण्याची शक्यता आहे. महाराष्ट्र, तमिळनाडू, गोवा, मिझोरम इ. राज्यात तर आताच हा आकडा ५०% च्या आसपास आहे. १९९१ साली भारताने आर्थिक विकासासाठी उदारीकरणाचे धोरण स्वीकारले. ओघानेच नागरीकरणासही वेग आला. नागरीकरण वाढले की बांधकाम क्षेत्र भरभराटीस येते. apartments/ row -houses/ pent - houses, मॉल्स, multiplexes, रस्ते - उड्डाणपूल, मेट्रो याच्या मार्गाने बांधकामाची मागणी वाढते. परिणामी बांधकामासाठी लागणाऱ्या कच्च्या मालाची मागणी देखील वाढत जाते. पोलाद, वाळू, लाकूड, विटा यासारखे धंदे तेजीत येतात. या सगळ्या साखळीत ग्रामीण भाग / वनवासी भाग नकळत अडकला जातो, आणि भरडलाही!
वाळूच्या बाबतीत हेच होत आहे. गेली काही वर्षे हा प्रश्न महाराष्ट्रात रण पेटवतो आहे. कायदे झाले, धोरणे ठरवण्यात आली, लुटा-लूट झाली, रक्त सांडले. पण वाळू पेटतच आहे. ह्याचे अर्थकारण समजून घेण्याचा प्रयत्न केला. पण सगळा सावळ गोंधळच. जिल्हापातळीवर जिल्हाधिकारी वाळू-पट्ट्याचे लिलाव करतो. ना कुठली मोजणी, ना संसाधन-निर्धारण, ना मूल्य-निर्धारण! निविदा मागवून सर्वात जास्त बोली लावणाऱ्या ठेकेदाराला पट्टा बहाल केला जातो. जिल्हा-तालुका पातळीवर होणाऱ्या या लिलावांमध्ये धांदली - भ्रष्टाचार किती होत असेल हे वेगळे सांगायला नको. पण तरीही हे अर्थकारण समजावून घेण्यास काहीतरी आधार हवा, म्हणून ढोबळ तत्त्वावर घेतलेला एक आढावा --
· वाळू पट्टा - मौजे वांगी, तालुका - मानवत, जिल्हा - परभणी.
· नदीक्षेत्र - गोदावरी
· ठेकेदारीचे वर्ष - २००७-०८
· कंत्राटाची रक्कम - २९ लाख (१२ महिन्यांकरिता)
· उपशाचा कालावधी - १० महिने (पावसाचे २ महिने उपसा करणे दुरापास्त होते)
· गावकऱ्यांच्या सांगण्यावरून दररोज किमान ३० ट्रक्स वाळूचा उपसा होत असे.
· एका ट्रक मध्ये साधारण २ ते ४ ब्रास वाळू असते.
· एका ट्रकची तत्कालीन किमत (परभणी भागात) - रु. २००० ते २५०० होती.
· ह्यानुसार एका महिन्यात - किमान ९०० ट्रक्स आणि विक्री रु. १८ लाख ते २२.५ लाख
· म्हणजेच एका वर्षातील विक्री - रु. १.८ कोटी ते २.२५ कोटी (१० महिन्यांप्रमाणे)
· एका महिन्यात सुमारे १८०० ते ३६०० ब्रास वाळू उपसा होतो म्हणजे वर्षाकाठी अंदाजे १८००० ते ३६००० ब्रास
· २०११-१२ च्या परभणी जिल्ह्या - वाळू लिलाव - सीआर मध्ये वांगी गावासाठी अंदाजे उपलब्ध वाळू २६५० ब्रास दाखवली असून त्याची सरकारी किमत (अपसेट प्राईस) रु २१.८४ लाख एवढी सांगितली आहे - ह्याचे कंत्राट रु. ३१ लाख ला देण्यात आले आहे.
· सध्या एक ब्रास नैसर्गिक वाळूची पुण्यातली किंमत रु. १०००० आहे
हे या अर्थकारणामागचे रहस्य. मजुरीचा, वाहतुकीचा खर्च वगळूनही निव्वळ नफा हा किमान १-१.२५ कोटीपर्यंत जातो. हे फक्त परभणी जिल्ह्यातील एका छोट्या गावाबाबत. हेच प्रमाण संपूर्ण महाराष्ट्राबाबत लागू करून बघता, सगळी गणिते गळून पडतात!
पण हे अर्थकारण फक्त येथेच थांबत नाही. वाळू विक्रीतील ह्या 'घबाड्या' (windfall gain) व्यतिरिक्त ग्रामीण-शहरी अर्थव्यवस्था, दळणवळण व्यवस्था, रस्ते, रोजगार ह्या सर्व क्षेत्रात याची झळ पोहचते.
वाळूउपश्याचे दुष्परिणाम:


वाळू उपशाच्या प्रक्रियेबाबत शासनाने घालून दिलेले सगळे नियम धाब्यावर बसवून वाळू उत्खनन सर्रास चालू आहे. एकेका क्षेत्रातून २०-२५ हजार ब्रास वाळू उत्‍खनन करतात आणि रानोमाळ वाळूचे डेपो (साठा) तयार करतात. बोटी, पोकलेन अशा अत्‍याधुनिक अवजारांनी युक्त या वाळूमाफियांनी नद्यांमध्‍येच विहिरी, तलाव, तळी निर्माण केली आहेत. सांप्रत ३० ते ५० फूट खोल खड्डयांमुळे सार्‍याच नद्यांची पात्रे खोल व धोकादायक बनली आहेत. अमर्याद उत्‍खनन झाल्‍याने नदीपात्रे खोल गेली आहेत व परिणामी भूजल पातळी खालावल्‍याने विहिरी, तलाव, तळी आटली आहेत. २०-२५ वर्षापूर्वी १५-२० फुटांवर आडाला, विहिरीला पाणी लागत असे. परंतु आज नद्यांमधील सततच्‍या वाळूउत्‍खननामुळे भूजलपातळी कमालीची खोल गेली आहेत. ५०-६० फूट खोल खोदूनही विहिरींना पाणी लागत नाही. जुन्‍या विहिरी, तळी, तलाव आटले आहेत. पावसाचे पाणी जिरत नसल्‍याने प्रत्‍येक पूर अतोनात नुकसान करुन जात आहे व मागे नद्या-नाले कोरडे पडत आहेत. ‘पाणी अडवा पाणी जिरवा’ या शासकीय घोषणेची शासनानेच खिल्‍ली उडविली आहे.
सध्‍याच्‍या नद्या म्‍हणजे गढूळ पाण्‍याचे नाले झाले आहेत. नद्यांची गटारे झाल्‍याने ते गढूळ पाणी रोगराई पसरवीत आहे. नदीपात्रात खोल विहिरी, तळी निर्माण केल्‍यामुळे नद्यांकडचे पाणवठेच नष्‍ट झाले आहेत. रानावनातून जनावरांना प्‍यायला पाणी मिळत नाही. गुरेढोरे व वन्‍यजीव पाण्‍याचा अंदाज न आल्‍याने किंवा पायाखालची वाळू सरकल्‍याने तोल जाऊन नद्यांमध्‍ये पडत आहेत व जमिनीची धूप होत असल्‍याने त्‍यांना बाहेरही येता येत नाही. परिणामी वन्‍यजीव, जनावरे मरत आहेत. मनुष्‍य व प्राणिमित्रांची जीवितहानी ही नित्‍याची बाब झाली आहे. नदीपात्रात प्रामुख्‍याने वाळूत नदीकाठी झुडपाच्‍या आश्रयाला असलेले पक्षी देखील नामशेष होण्‍याच्‍या मार्गावर आहेत. मोरांची संख्‍या कमी झाली आहे. वाळूउपसा करताना नदीपात्रात वापरल्‍या जाणार्‍या इंजिनामधून ऑईल, डिझेलसारखी रासायनिक द्रव्‍ये मोठया प्रमाणात सांडल्यामुळे अनेक जलचर नष्‍ट झाले आहेत. स्‍थलांतरित झालेल्‍या वाळू उत्‍खनन कामगारांनी सरपणासाठी नदीकाठची झाडे तोडली आहेत. मोठया प्रमाणात सुपीक जमिनीची धूप होत आहे व नदीपात्रेच बदलत आहेत. वातावरणात बदल, ग्‍लोबल वॉर्मिग, पर्यावरण संवर्धन या शब्‍दापासूनही अनभिज्ञ असलेली बिल्‍डर लॉबी, वाळूमाफिया, सरकारी यंत्रणा, वाळूउत्‍खनन करणारे कर्मचारी आणि लोकप्रतिनिधी हे सर्व ह्यास जबाबदार आहेत. त्यांनी नदीकाठच्या पर्यावरणाचा रऱ्हास करून टाकला आहे.
वाळू वाहतूकीचे दुष्परिणाम:
वाळूची मुख्य मागणी नागरी भागात आहे. त्यामुळे ही वाळू नदीपात्राकडून शहरी भागाकडे नेणे अपरिहार्य होते. वाळूचे कंत्राट मिळाले की वाळूचे रुपांतर सोन्यात होते. वरील आकडेवारी वरून हे स्पष्ट होतेच. दोन ब्रास वाळूची वाहतूक करणे परवडणारे नाही. त्यामुळे किमान ४-५ ब्रास वाळूची वाहतूक करण्यात येते. पंतप्रधान ग्रामीण सडक योजनेंतर्गत बांधलेल्या रस्त्यांवरून १० टन वजनाचे ट्रक जाऊ शकतात. मात्र ४ ब्रास वाळू म्हणजे जवळपास १६ टन वजनाची वाळू असलेल्या ट्रक्सची वाहतूक अशा रस्त्यांवरून होते. गोदावरी नदीच्या पात्रातून उपसा केलेल्या वाळूची दररोज वाहतूक करणाऱ्या प्रचंड क्षमतेच्या शेकडो टिप्पर्सनी कित्येक किलोमीटरपर्यंतचे रस्ते पूर्णतः उखडून टाकले आहेत. परिणामी, शेकडो गावांतील दळणवळणाचा प्रश्‍न गंभीर झाला आहे. रस्ते उखडल्याने कोट्यवधींचे नुकसान होत आहे. आज वाळू वाहतुकीमुळे परभणी-बीड-औरंगाबाद, सोलापूर-नगर-पुणे-मुंबई ह्या भागात रस्ते उखडले गेल्यामुळे शासनाचे कोट्यावधी रुपयांचे नुकसान झाले आहे.
याउलट नदीच्या पात्रातील वाळूपट्ट्यांमधून चारचाकी टेम्पो, ट्रॅक्‍टर, सहाचाकी ट्रकपासून 16 चाकी टिप्पर्समार्फत वाळू मोठ्या प्रमाणावर वाहून नेण्यात येते. यामुळेच ह्या क्षेत्रातील उद्योग मात्र भरभराटीस आले आहेत. गेल्या काही वर्षात भारतीय ट्रक्स क्षेत्र १४% ने वाढत आहे. क्रिसिल च्या अवाहालानुसार सध्या भारतात ६.७ लाख ट्रक्स आहेत, हीच संख्या २०१४-१५ पर्यंत १२.७५ लाखापर्यंत जाण्याची शक्यता आहे. या जोरदार संधीमुळे जपानी, चीनी कंपन्या भारतात विस्तार करीत आहेत.
रस्त्यांच्या दुरवस्थेमुळे रस्तांवरून चालणाऱ्या वाहनांचे गणितेही बिघडत आहेत. इंधनाचा अधिक खर्च, त्यामुळे होणारे प्रदूषण, दुरुस्तीचा खर्च वाढला आहे. परिवहन मंडळाच्या परभणी विभागाच्या एका वरिष्ठ अधिकाऱ्याने याबाबत अशी माहिती दिली -
· सरासरी १० ते १५ फेऱ्या दररोज केवळ खराब रस्त्यांमुळे रद्द होत आहेत.
· दरमहा वाढलेला तांत्रिक खर्च
o स्प्रिंग व पाटे तुटणे - १८ लाख
o टायर पंक्‍चर, फुटणे - ३ लाख ६२ हजार
o वाढीव इंधन - ७ लाख रुपये
o बसगाड्यांची दुरुस्ती - १० लाख रुपय
· याशिवाय वैयक्तिक वाहनांचा वाढलेला खर्च तर अगणनीय आहे.
वाळू वाहतुकीसाठी काही नियम आहेत. जसे- ट्रक वर कापड टाकून वाहतूक कारणे. ह्या नियमाचे सर्रास उल्लंघन होते. त्यामुळे वाळूच्या ट्रकमागे मोठी धूळ उडते. त्यामुळे मागून येणाऱ्या छोट्या गाड्या जसे दुचाकी वगैरे चालविण्यास मोठी अडचण होते. दुचाकींच्या वाढलेल्या अपघातामागे 'अल्प-दर्शनक्षमता' (low visibility) हे एक महत्त्वाचे कारण आहे. दर्शनक्षमता कमी होण्यामागे मोठ्या गाड्यांमुळे उडालेली धूळ असते, हे सरळ आहे. आर्थिक नुकसानिशिवाय मानवी नुकसानही होतेच आहे.
वाळू मागणीक्षेत्र:
वाळूची वाढत्या मागणीमागे 'औद्योगिकीकरण' आणि त्यामुळे वाढते 'नागरीकरण' आहे. उदयास आलेला मध्यमवर्ग नागरी भागात घरांची मागणी करू लागला आहे. सोबतच पायाभूत सोयी-सुविधांचीही मागणी आहेच. त्यामुळे बांधकाम क्षेत्र प्रचंड भरभराटीस आले. वाळू सारख्या कच्च्या मालाचीही मागणी वाढली. पण मागणी - पुरवठा ह्या अर्थकारणामध्ये कंत्राटदार, बांधकाम व्यावसायिक, वाहतूक माफिया आणि राजकीय नेते ह्यांनी भट्टी जमविली. स्वस्तात वाळूसारखी संसाधने मिळवायची, मागणी-पुरवठा नियंत्रित करून सोन्याचा भाव द्यायचा, घराच्या किमती अवाच्यासव्वा वाढवायच्या आणि ह्या सगळ्या व्यवहारात गडगंज फायदा मिळवायचा असे अगदी सामान्य गणित आहे. गौण खनिजाच्या लिलावात महसुलाचे नुकसान होतच आहे. पण याच महसुलातून सामन्यांसाठी तयार केलेल्या पायाभूत सुविधा पण 'उखडल्या' जात आहेत. सामान्य माणसाला तर दुहेरी फटका बसत आहे. या सुविधांचा उपभोक्ता म्हणून 'खाचखळगे' तर तो सहन करतोच, पण एका बाजूला नदीकाठच्या गावांचे अर्थशास्त्र कोसळत आहे तर दुसऱ्या बाजूला 'नव-मध्यमवर्ग' महिन्याचे हप्ते भरून आपले गणित कसेतरी जुळवत आहे.
वाळू बनणे ही हजारो वर्षांची नैसर्गिक प्रक्रिया आहे. ती मनुष्याला तयार करता येत नाही. परंतु आपण कृत्रिम वाळू, क्रश सॅण्‍ड (एम-सॅण्‍ड) वापरु शकतो. ही वाळू विशिष्‍ट प्रकारच्‍या दगडापासून तयार केली जाते. नदी तसेच समुद्रातील वाळूला हा अत्‍यंत चांगला पर्याय असून त्‍यामुळे नदी, तसेच समुद्रपात्रात होणारी झीज टाळता येऊ शकते. बिल्‍डर लॉबीच्या मते, क्रशर सॅण्‍डमुळे बांधकाम निकृष्‍ट दर्जाचे होते, परंतु हह्यात फारसे तथ्य नाही. कारण केरळ, तमिळनाडू, आंध्रप्रदेश इत्‍यादी प्रदेशात बांधकामासाठी अशा प्रकारच्‍या वाळूचा मोठया प्रमाणात वापर केला जातो. याउलट विविध योजनांतर्गत नदीच्‍या व समुद्राच्‍या वाळूने बांधलेल्‍या मुंबईतील ९० टक्‍के इमारती निकृष्‍ट दर्जाच्‍या आहेत, हे शासनाने ध्‍यानात घ्‍यावे. जुन्‍या इमारती पाडल्‍यानंतर निघणार्‍या रॅबिटवर प्रक्रिया करुन पुन्‍हा बांधकामात वापरण्‍याचे तंत्रज्ञान विविध देशात विकसित झाले आहे. त्‍याचाही या बिल्‍डर लॉबीने व शासनाने अभ्‍यास करावा. व हा वाळूउपसा थांबवावा. अशाप्रकारचे पर्याय बिल्‍डरांना सहज परवडू शकतात. परंतु गरीब शेतकर्‍याला त्‍यांचे सुपीक क्षेत्र पाण्‍यात जाणे हे कधीच परवडणारे नाही किंवा पर्यावरणाचेही त्‍यात हित नाही..!
(अर्थपूर्ण मासिकाच्या फेब्रुवारी २०१२ च्या अंकात हा लेख प्रसिद्ध झाला होता. )

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Prakashyatra: A Tour for Enlightenment

My article Published at CRI - Please click on the link..

Prakashyatra: A Tour for Enlightenment : Centre Right India


PRAKASHYATRA: A TOUR FOR ENLIGHTENMENT

(Abhishek M Chaudhari, an Engineering Graduate from Parbhani, visited Gujarat visit as part of Prakashyatra, an initiative of Mumbai based Rambhau Mhalagi Prabodhini. It was a governance tour program, specifically for youths to know about developmental initiative of Gujarat. The 3 day tour was from 22 to 24 August. He penned down this piece after his trip)
India is going through a political upheaval. We keep reading about various political dramas, immature statements by the politicians, making and breaking of the coalitions. Government, in the center as well as in various states, is failing to deliver basic services to the people it governs. Several corruption scandals are coming to the surface; 2G scam, Commonwealth Games scandal, Adarsh Society case, and the recent Coalgate scam; the list is unending. We get to read a lot of things about these scams too.
 As a ‘common man’, I find myself to be helpless in front of this corrupt, inefficient government. I had readily taken part in the movement against corruption last year. But that movement also could not bear any fruits. Implementation of an effective Lokpal Bill still looks like a distant possibility. The helpless and angry ‘common man’ in me continues to ventilate his feelings through the social media.
 While I was surfing through the internet one day, I saw a proposal about the study tour; it was named ‘Prakashyatra – Gujarat’. This was an intiative by Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini (RMP), Mumbai. I was aware of this institute based in Mumbai that trains young political activists and social workers. I had also attended some of their seminars in Delhi. Nevertheless, this ‘Prakashyatra – Gujarat’ seemed to be a novel idea.
 It was a 3-day Governance Tour to Gujarat, specially designed for youths. The plan was to study their model of development, to know about the developmental projects in details, to visit some of these projects, and lastly to meet and interact with Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi. The ‘Gujarat Model’ is being talked about everywhere these days. While rest of India is lagging behind  Gujarat has been doing surprisingly well. It was indeed a great opportunity to see those things directly. I was amazed by the plan and immediately applied.
There was an All-India screening through which the applicants had to go; but fortunately I could clear it. RMP had selected 14 young professionals; they had come from various parts of India and belonged to different professions. It was also a great opportunity to meet active people from various fields. We were to be accompanied by Mr. Ravindra Sathe of RMP. I reached Ahmedabad on August 22. Our stay was near the Shahi Baag circuit house. With the delicious Gujarati breakfast of ‘jalebi-papadi’, we all were informally introduced to each other.
 A bus was waiting for us outside, to take us on our ‘Prakashyatra’. There were 2 officers of the Information department to guide us through the tour. The bus took us to the Gandhinagar Secretariate, where we were given informative presentations about 5 major initiatives of the Government.
 Om Namami Devi Narmade…
An engineer from the Sardar Sarovar project was the first presenter. Sardar Sarovar is a huge project to divert water from river Narmada in southern Gujarat to central-northern-western Gujarat through canals. The main canal is 456 km long. Then other canals of approximately 1900 km length will take this water to several parts of the state. Moreover, canals will also discharge water in river Sabarmati and river Mahi. This project was praised as one of the 8 incredible projects in the world in 1994. The project is dually useful  as it supplies water and produces energy. The plan is to supply 28 MAP (Million Acre Feet) water and to produce 1450 MW energy. This will bring 18 lacks hector land of Gujarat under irrigation, as at least 9000 villages and 131 towns would receive water supply, 30000 hector of land will be protected from floods, and there will be 10 lack employment creations.
Next presentation was about the water management in Gujarat. Water will reach villages through the canals. But wat after that? It is a common experience in India that major water supply projects are initiated, but water does not reach common man. This is where Gujarat stands different. Modi Government initiated changes in water supply and management system in 2002. Firstly, the Water Supply department was rearranged. A new Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), named WASMO, was established. ’Users are the best managers’ is there motto! The Water Committee (Pani Samitee) is the major institution in this project. The water committees in villages do the water need-assessments and accordingly make plans. Implementation of the plan is also the responsibility of that committee. WASMO provides technical and financial assistance for the implementation of the projects. Tariff of the water, time-frame for its collection is decided by the Water Committee with the consent of the Gram-sabha. Till date, Water Committee has been set up in almost 90% of the villages; 8000 projects were completed till june 2012, 75% households are receiving water supply through taps. Moreover, 1,19,149 personnel are specially trained to maintain the quality of water that is being supplied. According to one study conducted in Gandhinagar district, 98% of water supplied is clean, pure and potable. WASMO has received several awards, including Prime Minister’s Best Public Service Award (2008), United Nations Public Service Award (2009) and International Award for Novelty by CAPAM organisation (2010).
 Gujarat: The Real Gateway of India
The third presentation was regarding the maritime transport and port management. Gujarat is gifted with the 1600 km coastline. In addition to this, it’s location is ‘geo-politically’ very important. Understanding this, Gujarat has achieved a lot in maritime transport and development of ports. In last 15 years, the contribution of Gujarat Maritime Board has increased from 8% to 28%. Among 915 sea ports in India  260 are situated in Gujarat. As we know, Gujarat government has been encouraging private investment. Consequently, in last 10 years, more than 20000 crores have been invested for the development of ports. Thus, several private ports have been developed, like Dahej, Mundhra, Pipagaon, Sikka, Hazeera. Ship-building is also encouraged. For easy access to the ports, there is coordination between rail-road-sea transports. Moreover, other projects like, ro-ro round service, greenfield port project, port SEZ project, Sea training program, etc are also underway. States having large coastline, like Maharashtra (840 km) can learn a lot from Gujarat. We have heard of Gateway of India situated in Mumbai. Today, Gujarat is trying to become the ‘real’ Gateway of India.
 Sky is the limit
Next presentation was about one of the most ambitious projects of the government. Dholera Special Investment Region (SIR) is first of its kind in India. Dholera SIR was set up by the Gujarat government through a special act in 2009. It will be established on a land of approximately 90,000 hectors. It would include 6 core industrial sectors, 6 CBDs, 3 IT parks, Ahmedabad- Bhavnagar highway, as well as several play-grounds, air ports, golf courses, solar fields, Kalpasar dam, etc. The SIR will create employment for 8 lac people. It is sure to create New Gujarat within Gujarat. Indeed, this is the tag line of the project.
 The last presentation was about the GIFT. Economic globalization is the most striking feature of the 21st century. There are several challenges in front of us in this ever-changing world. Mr. Narendra Modi has realized these challenges and has taken up a huge project in hands, that is ‘GIFT’!  It is a project to build a ‘finance city’, based on the idea of Le-Defense of Paris or Dockyard of London. The proposed finance city can provide the financial services not only to India but to the world. Target is to achieve $400 billion contribution to GDP and creation of 1 crore employment till 2020. According to a study by McKinsey, the proposed GIFT city will accommodate total of 5 Gurgaon’s and 7 Pune’s. GIFT is not to be confined to commerce, plan is also to develop it as an entertainment hub. To know more about GIFT and to see its Diamond shaped central building, please visit its website.
 On the front of Sabaramati
Impressed by these 5 presentations, we left the secratariat and turned to our next destination, Sabarmati River Front!! Rivers are fast deteriorating in the 21st century because of the developmental activities, and unprecedented pollution. We always hear the cries of ‘save Ganga’, ‘save Yamuna’. However, these slogans hardly materialize. But when concerns about deterioration of river Sabarmati were being raised, Gujarat government came up with a unique plan. Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation was established for the development of 11 km stretch on both sides of river Sabarmati that runs through the city of Ahmedabad. All the drainage outlets were diverted to clean and purify the flow of water. To maintian the water level in Sabarmati, water was diverted from river Narmada through the main canal of Sardar Sarovar project and it was released in Sabarmati. This region (Sabarmati River Front) is also to be developed as a tourist attraction, with beautiful side-walks, amusement parks, cultural activity centers, and museums being set up. In addition to this, ‘ferry service’ is also planned for water transport. This project will increase the ground water levels, and improve the water supply in the town. It will create green Ahmedabad. The project has received several national and international awards even before its completion.
 Janmarg
Today, all the major cities are facing the problem of transport. Gujarat has achieved 42% urbanization. The percentage is likely to cross 50% in coming years. It is very important to find the solution of the transport problem. We were shown a revolutionary project of to solve the challenges faced in urban transportation - Ahmedabad BRTS project. Such BRTS projects were also initiated in cities like Delhi and Pune; they are also planned in some other cities. But till date, Ahmedabad BRTS is the only successful BRTS project in India. This is a 90 km bus service (today 45% is working) that transports 1.25 lac people every day. The project is developed through Public Private Partnership (PPP). BRTS control room is well-equipped by information technology and GPS. We were given live demonstration from this control room. All the information, like current location of the bus, driver’s name, his entire record, number of the passengers, is displayed on the big screen. We also had a round in the BRTS bus. Speedy service, spacious buses, limited passengers and beautiful bus stops, everything was praiseworthy.
 Our last destination for the first day was a ‘child park’. Though it was a child park, adults would also be very happy to visit it. This park is developed on a unique concept. There are small models of bank, post office, police station, law court, hospital, radio room; and also replicas of BRTS bus, ambulance van and fire brigade vehicle. Kids can go to the small bank, take out money at the ATMs, and deposit cheques. There are live demonstrations by the kids at all these models. Children come in the fire-brigade vehicle and try to rescue people from fire site; kids play judges in courts, punish criminals and deliver justice; and they become doctors in the hospital and do surgeries! We were amazed to see this small but moving world of children. Kids playing in such a garden are sure to become responsible citizens of India tomorrow!
 The Solar Ocean
The second day of the tour began very early. We got into our bus at 6′o clock. We were to reach Charanka Solar Park, that was 250 km away from Ahmedabad. This is the only solar plant, not only in India but also in Asia, that produces 500 MW solar energy at one place. This is possible only because of Mr. Modi’s leadership. He not only succeeded in attracting private investors in solar sector but also managed to keep the tariff low. Gujarat already had good basic infrastructure. At the same time, system of governance was also made easy and accessible for the private investors. Investors chose this easy system over the red-tapism found elsewhere in India.
 Mr. Modi wants to make Gujarat a hub of solar power. But production of solar energy needs a lot of space, as approximately 5 acres of land is required to produce 1 MW of solar energy. Therefore, there was a problem of land. This problem was also solved in a unique way. Solar panels were installed on the Mehsana canal in the Sardar Sarovar project. This was beneficial in two ways; as the land was saved, as well as there was reduction in water evaporation. Moreover, water heats and cools very slowly. Considering this characteristic of water, there is plenty of heat content available for the solar panels. In total 1000 MW solar energy that India produces, 600 MW is produced in Gujarat alone.
However, Gujarat is not confined to solar energy. In fact it has achieved considerably in overall energy sector. There was a complete revolution in the field of energy production, transmission and distribution since 2003; and several improvements were introduced in the power sector through systematic planning. Transmission  distribution loss is brought down from 36% to 20%. There was scarcity of 500MW in Gujarat in 2000-2001; today, Gujarat is producing 2500 MW of surplus energy. The ‘Jyotigram Yojana’ of the Gujarat government is implemented all over India today. It is being praised from around the world.
We came back to Ahmedabad in the evening. I want to bring it to your attention another aspect of development here. Charanka is 250 km away from Ahmedabad. It is situated in the remote region of the Rann of Kutch. Even in such a condition, we reached Charanka in just 4 hours. We travelled through the national highway, state highway, and also district roads. But roads were of top quality. Even after travelling for 500 km in a day, we felt very fresh in the evening.
 Narendra Modi…
A meeting with Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi was scheduled during the 3rd day. The meeting was fixed in Gandhinagar Circuit House. Chief Minister came sharp at 11′o clock. He waved at us and asked, ‘क्यों प्रकाशयात्रीओं,
प्रकाशमान हो गए?’ (are you enlightened through this tour?). After the introduction session, he was willing to hear the ideas of young Indian minds. Each of us spoke about what we saw, experienced, felt in last three days. He listened to us silently, with his face full of enthusiasm. He carefully took note of our suggestions. When he started speaking, he had taken threads from our talks. He spoke passionately, his words coming straight from his heart. It was his vigour, patriotism and experience supplementing his words. He modestly admitted that the development of Gujarat has just started, and it has to go long way. We were surprised; if this was the beginning for him, what exactly was his ‘end’. Where does he want to take Gujarat to…!!
 Former Prime Minister Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee made ‘development’ a national issue. Going ahead in that direction, Modi wants to make development a ‘basic need’. He wants development to be people’s movement. One of us asked him a question about the ‘sustainability’ of the Gujarat model. He immediately clarified, ‘Modi may or may not be there.. but development of Gujarat shall not stop’. Thus, his effort is to institutionalize every idea, every developmental activity. He touched several issues while talking to us. Another question was asked from our side, ‘how should be the system of government in the 21st century?’. He instantly relpied, ‘Maximum Governance Minimal Government’!
 Honestly I am lost for words to describe the Gujarat experience. Still, we were rightly aware of the fact that we could cover only 20-25% of the developmental activities in Gujarat. We could just hear about the Jyotigram plan, Karmayogi program, Annual ‘Chintan Shibir’ for the officers, Nirmal Gujarat plan, RURBAN plan, Chief Minister Fellowship plan, e-city, Sadbhavana Yatra, vidya-deep plan, teachers’ training institute, Raksha-Shakti University, etc. What we saw was the tip of an iceberg.
 While I came back from Gujarat, I was full of energy, vigour and enthusiasm. The feeling of helplessness had suddenly disappeared. This ‘Prakashyatra’ definitely proved to be a bright ‘ray of light’ in the current darkness!

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

FDI in Retail: Farmers' Perspective

National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC)


Provisions:
·         National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC), an agency to maintain data of terror modules, terrorists, their associates, friends, families and supporters.
·         The NCTC will derive powers from the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), which allows central government agencies to make arrests or searches in terror-related cases while keeping state police concerned into the loop.
·         The NCTC will also have the power to seek information, including documents, reports, transcripts, and cyber information from any agency, including from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), National Investigation Agency, NATGRID, National Technical Research Organization, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and all seven central armed police forces including the National Security Guard (NSG).
·         The agency has worked out on the model of the US' similar body aimed at combating terrorism by collecting and analysing threats, sharing the inputs and information with other agencies and converting this into actionable data.
·         The counter-terrorism agency will be a separate body located in the Intelligence Bureau under the control of the home ministry.
·         It will draw up plans and coordinate actions for counter terrorism" and will integrate intelligence pertaining to terrorism, analyse the same
·         The head of the NCTC will be called director and will be an officer in the rank of additional director IB.

Objections:

  1. The Congress government at the centre will use the NCTC to target non-Congress states
  2. The issue of NCTC have not been discussed with the opposition/states. This has been pattern since the case of nuclear issues alone. The decision to establish NCTC took 22 excruciating months; still it is not being discussed with any state government. 
  3.  The NCTC will infringe on the rights of the states stems from the fact that despite facing decades of insurgency and terrorism, India has failed to look at how our Constitution should strengthen our hands in fighting this twin malaise.
  4. The next objection is about multiplicity of agencies involved in counter-terrorism. While Multi Agency Centre (MAC) hitherto run by the Intelligence Bureau is to be subsumed into NCTC. But organizations like the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID) will continue functioning independently albeit all intelligence agencies are to provide inputs to NCTC.
  5. The power to arrest and seize, vested with the Joint Secretary in the Home Ministry and the State Home Secretary, was now sought to be transferred to IB officers in the NCTC. This can be misused against the state governments.


Oppositions:

Ø  Mr. Narendra Modi, Chief Minister, Gujarat - The order was an attack on the federal structure of the country. The Centre did not even bother to consult the State governments. It had infringed on the rights and powers of the State by issuing the order. He said that under the order, all the intelligence agencies would have to carry out an assisting role to the NCTC, which would also have the powers to arrest and search.
In the name of fighting terror and Naxalism, the Centre was out to violate the federal structure of the Constitution under which law and order was placed as a State subject and the State governments given the powers to maintain law and order and manage the police force. But the NCTC order was a clear attack on the State's rights and powers and straight violation of the federal spirit of the constitution.
Suggestion - There is need to develop trust among the States and to have a single strategy with political willpower to battle problems like terror and Naxalism.

Ø  Mr. Shivraj Singh Chouhan, Chief Minister, Madhya Pradesh - Centre's decision a serious setback to the federal structure of the country. Law and order issues are subjects of the State. The Centre is gradually trying to increase its intervention in the affairs of the States.

Ø  Prem Kumar Dhumal, Chief Minister, Himachal Pradesh - The move was another attempt to usurp the powers of the States. Whenever an incident of terrorism takes place, the Centre comes out with another investigating agency to divert the attention of the people and infringes upon the rights of the State, weakening the federal structure. The powers given to the CBI to investigate cases without nod from the State government and constitution of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) had trampled upon the rights of the States. Instead of fighting terror, the UPA government was trying to arm itself with powers to dilute the country's federal structure. Noting that multiplication of agencies and interference in the functioning of States would not help in curbing terrorism.

Ø  Ms. Mamta Banerjee, Chief Minister, West Bengal - It is difficult for the State government to accept such arbitrary exercise of power by the Central government/Central agencies, which have a bearing on the rights and privileges of the State as enshrined in the Constitution. They say the Centre's counter-terror blueprint violates principles of federalism and encroaches upon the turf of the States.

Ø  Mr. Naveen Patnaik, Chief Minister, Odisha – He asked the Prime-Minister to “review and withdraw” the February 3, 2012 order notifying the NCTC. The UPA government was issuing “authoritarian orders” without consulting the States. Asking the Prime Minister to review the order which had “draconian overtones,” Mr. Patnaik said the people were aware of their democratic and federal rights, which, at times, had to be underlined by the State governments to the Union government.

Ø  Ms. Jayalalithaa, Chief Minister, Tamilnadu - The proposed anti-terror body suffered from “deficiencies” and includes provisions that tantamount to usurping the legitimate rights of the States. The power to arrest and seize, vested with the Joint Secretary in the Home Ministry and the State Home Secretary, was now sought to be transferred to IB officers in the NCTC. This is highly objectionable and can be misused to suit ends that are motivated by reasons other than fighting terror. Moreover, setting up of inter-State intelligence teams is tantamount to usurping legitimate rights of the States.


Ø  Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar also opposed the Centre's move. Punjab Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal said it was a measure to usurp whatever was left of the States' authority in governance. Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh opposed the Centre's notification.

Ø  TDP chief, N. Chandrababu Naidu - Requested Prime Minister to withdraw the order and initiate debate with political parties and State governments along with a discussion in Parliament on this “vital issue affecting Centre-State relations.” Mr. Naidu took exception to the provision in the order empowering the Director, NCTC, specified as Designated Authority under Section 2 (e) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and his officers to arrest and conduct searches without prior consultation with the States. “It is inexplicable that such an important order, having ramifications over the Centre-State relations, has been issued without consulting the State governments and political parties.”



Wednesday, October 10, 2012


GEORGIA : ANTI- CORRUPTION REFORMS

“Since 2003, Georgia has implemented AN IMPRESSIVE ARRAY OF REFORMS. These reforms are reflected in pronounced political, social, and economic transformations following the ‘Rose Revolution’ at the end of 2003. The processes since the start of the reforms can be qualified as UNIQUE in terms of speed of reforms, degree of innovations, and extent of institutional restructuring. The reforms are recognized to have NOTICEABLY IMPROVED the institutional environment, provided a basis for more sustainable economic growth and human capital accumulation, and increased multi-fold foreign direct investments.”
— World Bank, April 2009, report No. 44400-GE   


     Anti-Corruption Achievements


Indices

Transparency CPI: 2011: 64/182 (Score: 4.1)
This field consists of the score for the country in question on the Corruption Perceptions Index from Transparency International as well as its ranking.
World Bank CORR Index (-2.5 - +2.5): 2010: -0.16
This field consists of the score for the country in question on the 'Control of Corruption' indicator in the World Bank Governance Research Indicator Country Snapshot (GRICS): 1996-2010.
OECD Country Risk Classification (0-7): 2012: 6
The classification of countries by risk category has the aim of providing OECD countries with a basis for calculating the premium interest rate to be charged to cover the risk of non-repayment of export credits. Countries are placed in risk categories 0 - 7, with 0 being the lowest risk category and thus the least expensive. Access the complete list of OECD Country Risk Classification figures.

Public Anti-Corruption Initiatives

Legislation:

Georgia passed anti-corruption legislation on line of the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). The government has worked further to harmonize Georgian legislation with the convention. Georgia's Criminal Code listed attempted corruption, active and passive bribery, bribing a foreign official as well as money laundering as criminal offenses and provided strictly punishments. Parliament has passed a package of constitutional amendments criminalizing the abuse of public office and bribery with a maximum sentence of 15 years and confiscation of property. The Law on Conflict of Interest and Corruption in the Public Sector, the guiding anti-corruption law, was incorporated into the 2005 National Anti-Corruption Strategy. The law prohibits corruption among public servants and requires the disclosure of assets by public officials and their families in order to ensure transparency. However, there is no follow-up mechanism in place to monitor and scrutinize these asset statements effectively. In order to prevent conflict of interest, the law also prohibits public servants from involvement in private business.

Government Strategies:

The Government of Georgia adopted a National Anti- Corruption Strategy in June 2005, followed by an Implementation Action Plan in September that same year. The goal is to improve transparency and effectiveness of the civil service and strengthening the role of inspectors general within public agencies.

Anti-Corruption Council:

An Anti-Corruption Council was set up in January 2009 in order to support and update the National Anti-Corruption Strategy.

Anti-Corruption Agencies:

Georgia's main anti-corruption body is the National Security Council which was charged with the drafting of the 2005 National Anti-Corruption Strategy. The State Ministry of Reform Coordination oversees the strategy's implementation. Neither the council nor the ministry can be defined as independent anti-corruption agencies. Reforms in the Criminal Procedure of Georgia removed the responsibility from the General Prosecutor's Office to deal with crimes other than those that are corruption-related, effectively turning it into an anti-corruption agency. Thereby, Georgia increased its compliance with the UNCAC, which stipulates that each country adhering to the convention should establish an independent anti-corruption agency. The Main Investigative Department within the General Prosecutor's Office has exclusive jurisdiction over all corruption-related offences within Georgia.

The National Ombudsman:

The Ombudsman, also called the Public Defender of Georgia, was established in 1997. The Public Defender institution supervises the protection of human rights. It also supervises the activities of public authorities, public officials and legal persons and evaluates their activities. It has become a quite strong organisation. In principle, it is independent, although the government tries to influence it. It has received much support from several international donors, including USAID primarily, but also Sida and Danida among others, to secure the professionalism of its staff. The Public Defender does not have the authority to investigate cases, and can only recommend to law enforcement authorities that they initiate investigations.

The Auditor-General:

The Chamber of Control of Georgia (CCG) is the main audit unit in the country. It has been going through reforms to fulfil its role as an independent external auditing body able to ensure that good governance is upheld. A project to aid this development is taking place with the support of German experts. CCG auditors are receiving training in international auditing principles. The reform of the CCG has not yet been completed, and the legal framework for its work is still weak according to Global Integrity 2008.

E-Governance:

Many Georgian ministries now have informative websites to increase transparency, although some ministry websites lack information in English, which makes it difficult for potential international partners to understand procedures. The Ministry of Finance provides online services for company registration, taxes and customs (under development). The State Procurement Agency has developed an online service where tenders are published with relevant contact information. This will gradually promote transparency. The Ministry of Economic Development has produced a privatisation website detailing ongoing privatization initiatives and sales in order to increase transparency and equality within the privatization process.

Public Procurement:

Georgia established the State Procurement Agency (SPA), again under the control of the Ministry of Economic Development. It is supposed to function with greater power and independence, although it remains subject to the ministry's interference. The Law on Public Procurement 2005 was drafted by the SPA, passed in 2005 and put into force 1 January 2006. The law stipulates that public tenders should be publicized. Enforcement, however, is still relatively weak in certain aspects due to the inadequate training of officials and the low level of awareness of this law. The government has been making efforts to improve the transparency and efficiency of the public procurement system, in part by strengthening information exchanges between the State Procurement Agency and the Ministry of Finance.

Whistle-Blowing:

Whistle-blower protection is supposedly ensured by the 2004 Law on Freedom of Speech and Expression (Art. 12) as long as the disclosure is judged to be in 'the public and lawful societal interest'. However, whistleblowers within state institutions reportedly continue to suffer from disciplinary action and harassment when they report suspicious activities within state institutions. The right to access public information is secured in the General Administrative Code of Georgia (Chapter 3: Freedom of Information), although the Law on State Secrets places restrictions on revealing information believed to be damaging for the sovereignty and security of the country. Regardless of the freedom of information provisions, Global Integrity 2008 reports that public offices are known to ignore or delay requests to access information and whistleblower protections lack regulation. Global Integrity 2008 assesses Georgia's whistle-blowing regulations as 'very weak'.

By 2012, anti-corruption reforms had taken priority and Saakashvili's policy has produced results. In the past few years, the level of corruption in Georgia has decreased significantly, and citizen confidence in public institutions and public officials has increased considerably. The establishment of the Anti-Corruption Interagency Council in 2008, and a significant progress in criminalising corruption in line with international standards, have illustrated that the government is committed to fighting corruption.


“  

“Compared to other countries, Georgia has the highest rate of respondents who say that their government’s actions to fight corruption have been ‘effective’ or ‘extremely effective.’ Similarly, with 78%, Georgia has by far the highest rate of people stating that corruption has ‘decreased a lot’ or ‘decreased’ in the past three years.” – Transparency International, December 2010
“The progress that Georgia has made against corruption is already serving as a role model for many other countries seeking to replicate the success that Georgia has had.” US Secretary of – State Hillary Rodham Clinton, October 6, 2010
“84% of the Georgian population have confidence in the police.” – International Republican Institute, October 2010
      ”


Private Anti-Corruption Initiatives

Media:

Georgia has constitutionally institutionalised freedom of press and opinion, combined with the Law on Freedom of Speech and Expression. The Law on Broadcasting was adopted in December 2004 and in 2005 the State Television and Radio were transformed into the Georgian Public Broadcasting system (GPB). In 2004, the government passed a new libel law that clarifies that statements made in Parliament, courts and political debates are not considered libel. Furthermore, the law shifts the burden of proof to the accuser and specifies entire companies, rather than individual reporters, as defendants. According to Freedom House 2011, there were far fewer reports of direct government intervention in 2010 compared to previous years.
According to the assessment made by Transparency International's National Integrity Report 2011 on media, Georgian media have not been particularly successful or active in exposing corruption cases. In addition, the report also states that the authorities' influence have undermined the ability of the media to expose corruption. Reporters Without Borders 2011-2012 ranks Georgia 105th out of 179 countries, while Freedom House's Freedom of the Press index 2011 ranks the country 118th out of 196 countries and describes its press environment as 'partly free'.

 

Civil Society:

The civil society has been active even before the collapse of the Soviet Union and is still mainly funded by foreign donors. Freedom of assembly and association are generally respected by Georgian authorities. Many NGOs themselves play an important role in public debates and discussions in Georgia, but the general unwillingness of the government to engage with civil society has weakened the latter's ability to assert influence.

Transparency International Georgia:

Transparency International Georgia is active in promoting corruption awareness and transparency, and monitoring government initiatives. Annual reports (in Georgian) concerning corruption can be accessed on the organisation's website. Transparency International Georgia has also established the Georgia Advocacy and Legal Advice Center (G-ALAC). The G-ALAC aims to assist citizens in resolving corruption related problems, and it also provides a free hotline for citizens to report corruption cases. So far the majority of corruption related complaints received by the G-ALAC are related to judicial corruption and property rights violations.

Open Society Georgia Foundation:

The Open Society Georgia Foundation, a member of the Soros Foundation, works to increase transparency in public administration and build democratic values through the rule of law. It runs several other programmes, including a civil society and media support programme and belongs to a coalition of NGOs in Georgia called For Transparency of Public Finance, which publishes reports and monitors public financing and public policies.

Civil Society Institute:

The Civil Society Institute is an NGO that works to enhance good governance and transparency. The Civil Society Institute is involved in the drafting of laws and carries out watchdog activities on government work. Furthermore, the Civil Society Institute is also involved in training public officials in good governance.

Sources for further reading:


“Today Georgia has reinvented itself as THE STAR OF THE CAUCASUS. It is less corrupt than most former Soviet republics and one of the easiest places in the world to do business, according to the World Bank. Its liberalised economy has weathered Russian embargoes, and the state held together during the war with Russia. Its police do not take bribes and electricity is no longer a luxury. Most important, people are no longer surprised by such success. The biggest transformation is In their minds. […] THE MENTAL SHIFT WHICH HAS OCCURRED IN GEORGIA WILL MAKE IT HARD TO TURN THE COUNTRY BACKWARDS.”
—“Georgia’s mental revolution”, The Economist, August 19, 2010